The site was identified as important in 2005 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | NT | winter | 2002 | frequent | A1 |
Sarus Crane Grus antigone | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus | NT | non-breeding | 1990-1999 | rare | A1, A4i |
Oriental Darter Anhinga melanogaster | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A1 |
Black-bellied Tern Sterna acuticauda | EN | unknown | 2004 | present | A1 |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | CR | non-breeding | 2002 | present | A1, A4ii |
Slender-billed Vulture Gyps tenuirostris | CR | non-breeding | 2002 | present | A1, A4ii |
Indian Spotted Eagle Clanga hastata | VU | unknown | 2004 | present | A1, A4ii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2005) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2005. The most recent assessment (2011) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2011 | very unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | moderate (70-90%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2003 | Jagadishpur Reservoir | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Jagdishpur Reservoir (Nepal). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/jagdishpur-reservoir-iba-nepal on 22/11/2024.