The site was identified as important in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mew Gull Larus canus | LC | breeding | 1996 | 1,000 breeding pairs | B2 |
Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus | LC | breeding | 1996 | 1,030 breeding pairs | B1i, B3, C3 |
Caspian Tern Hydroprogne caspia | LC | breeding | 1996 | 11 breeding pairs | B2, C6 |
Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea | LC | breeding | 1996 | 1,200 breeding pairs | C2 |
Black Guillemot Cepphus grylle | LC | breeding | 1996 | 560 breeding pairs | B1ii, B2 |
Razorbill Alca torda | LC | breeding | 1996 | 710 breeding pairs | B1ii, B3, C3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2000) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Mew Gull Larus canus | 1,000 | 600 | individuals | 60 | unfavourable |
Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus | 1,000 | 500 | individuals | 50 | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1981 | Itäisen Suomenlahden kansallispuisto | Kansallispuisto | 100 |
1996 | Itäisen Suomenlahden saaristo ja vedet | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 100 |
1998 | Itäisen Suomenlahden saaristo ja vedet | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
2005 | Itäisen Suomenlahden saaristo ja vedet/ Eastern Gulf of Finland Archipelago and waters | Baltic Sea Protected Area (HELCOM) | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | |
Marine Neritic | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
tourism/recreation | - |
hunting | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Itäinen Suomenlahti National Park (Finland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/itäinen-suomenlahti-national-park-iba-finland on 22/11/2024.