The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2006 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Himalayan Snowcock Tetraogallus himalayensis | LC | resident (2004–2006) | 4–5 pairs | A3 |
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus | NT | resident (2004–2006) | 1–4 pairs | A1 |
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug | EN | resident (2004–2006) | 1–2 pairs | A1 |
Yellow-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus | LC | breeding (2004–2006) | 25–30 pairs | A3 |
Hume's Lark Calandrella acutirostris | LC | breeding (2004–2006) | 15–25 pairs | A3 |
Sulphur-bellied Warbler Phylloscopus griseolus | LC | breeding (2004–2006) | 6–9 pairs | A3 |
Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria | LC | resident (2004–2006) | 10–15 pairs | A3 |
Himalayan Rubythroat Calliope pectoralis | LC | breeding (2004–2006) | 5–8 pairs | A3 |
White-winged Redstart Phoenicurus erythrogastrus | LC | breeding (2004–2006) | 10–15 pairs | A3 |
Altai Accentor Prunella himalayana | LC | breeding (2004–2006) | 15–20 pairs | A3 |
Alpine Accentor Prunella collaris | LC | breeding (2004–2006) | 20–30 pairs | A3 |
Brown Accentor Prunella fulvescens | LC | breeding (2004–2006) | 30–35 pairs | A3 |
White-winged Snowfinch Montifringilla nivalis | LC | breeding (2004–2006) | 20–30 pairs | A3 |
Water Pipit Anthus spinoletta | LC | breeding (2004–2006) | 20–25 pairs | A3 |
White-winged Grosbeak Mycerobas carnipes | LC | resident (2004–2006) | 10–15 pairs | A3 |
Red-mantled Rosefinch Carpodacus rhodochlamys | LC | breeding (2004–2006) | 7–8 pairs | A3 |
Eurasian Crimson-winged Finch Rhodopechys sanguineus | LC | breeding (2004–2006) | 10–15 pairs | A3 |
Plain Mountain-finch Leucosticte nemoricola | LC | resident (2004–2006) | 30–40 pairs | A3 |
Red-fronted Serin Serinus pusillus | LC | breeding (2004–2006) | 5–8 pairs | A3 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2006. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2006 | not assessed | high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | medium |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | likely in long term (>4 years) | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1969 | Искандеркульский | Заказник (IV) | 100 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | 5 | |
Forest | - | |
Grassland | - | |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | - | |
Shrubland | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 5 |
urban/industrial/transport | 5 |
tourism/recreation | 5 |
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Iskanderkul lake and mountains (Tajikistan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/iskanderkul-lake-and-mountains-iba-tajikistan on 23/12/2024.