The site was identified as important in 2011 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus | NT | resident | 2004 | min 114 breeding pairs | A1, A4ii, B1iii, B2, C1, C2, C6 |
Spanish Imperial Eagle Aquila adalberti | VU | resident | 2004 | min 2 breeding pairs | A1, B2, C1, C2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2011) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2011. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | favourable | very high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus | 90 | 90 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | likely in short term (within 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1989 | Valle de Iruelas | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 67 |
1997 | Valle de Iruelas | Reserva Natural | 67 |
1999 | Cerro de Guisando - ZEPA | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 28 |
2000 | Cerro De Guisando | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 26 |
2004 | Valle De Iruelas | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 66 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland, Native coniferous woodland, Mixed woodland, Alluvial and very wet forest, Broadleaved evergreen woodland | 50 |
Shrubland | Scrub | 40 |
Grassland | Alpine, subalpine and boreal grassland | 10 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Forestry plantations | - |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | Scree & boulders | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
forestry | 80 |
agriculture | 10 |
hunting | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Iruelas valley (Spain). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/iruelas-valley-iba-spain on 25/11/2024.