The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grey Plover Pluvialis squatarola | VU | passage | 2003 | present | A4i |
Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus | LC | passage | 2003 | present | A4i |
Dunlin Calidris alpina | NT | winter | 2003 | present | A4i |
Common Greenshank Tringa nebularia | LC | winter | 2003 | present | A4i |
Saunders's Gull Saundersilarus saundersi | VU | winter | 2003 | present | A1, A4i |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | near favourable | medium | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Marine Intertidal | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2003 | Common fishery right area(Saga) | 共同漁業権区域 | 84 |
2003 | Common fishery right area(Fukuoka) | 共同漁業権区域 | 16 |
2003 | Kashima shingomori | 都道府県指定鳥獣保護区 | <1 |
2015 | Higashiyoka-higata | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 1 |
2015 | Hizen Kashima-higata | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Neritic | major (>10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Inner Ariake bay (Japan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/inner-ariake-bay-iba-japan on 23/11/2024.