The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('key species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sooty Tern Onychoprion fuscatus | LC | breeding (-) | 500,000–1,000,000 individuals | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | - (-) | 500,100–1,000,500 individuals | A4iii |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2012) is shown below.
IBA conservation status | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2012 | not assessed | medium | very low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the key species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Actual vs Reference (units) | % remaining | Result | ||
Polynesian Storm-petrel Nesofregetta fuliginosa | 2 / 2 (individuals) | 100 | not assessed | ||
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | 84,000 / 84,000 (breeding pairs) | 100 | not assessed |
Pressure (threats to the key species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole population/area (>90%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | no deterioration (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the key species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | very low |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2025) Important Bird Area factsheet: Ilots rocheux de Ua Huka (French Polynesia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/ilots-rocheux-de-ua-huka-iba-french-polynesia on 21/01/2025.