The site was identified as important in 2001 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2001) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2001. The most recent assessment (2017) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2017 | very unfavourable | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Baumann's Greenbul Phyllastrephus baumanni | 3 | 0 | mature individuals | 0 | very unfavourable |
Ibadan Malimbe Malimbus ibadanensis | 3 | 0 | breeding pairs | 0 | very unfavourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | - | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | No management planning has taken place | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Ibadan | Forest Reserve | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | 5 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: IITA Forest Reserve, Ibadan (Nigeria). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/iita-forest-reserve-ibadan-iba-nigeria on 22/11/2024.