The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chilean Pigeon Patagioenas araucana | LC | resident | 2009 | abundant | A2, A3 |
Magellanic Woodpecker Campephilus magellanicus | LC | resident | 2009 | present | A3 |
Austral Parakeet Enicognathus ferrugineus | LC | breeding | 2009 | present | A3 |
Black-throated Huet-huet Pteroptochos tarnii | LC | resident | 2009 | present | A2, A3 |
Dusky Tapaculo Scytalopus fuscus | LC | resident | 2009 | present | A3 |
White-throated Treerunner Pygarrhichas albogularis | LC | resident | 2009 | present | A3 |
Thorn-tailed Rayadito Aphrastura spinicauda | LC | resident | 2009 | present | A3 |
Des Murs's Wiretail Sylviorthorhynchus desmurii | LC | resident | 2009 | present | A3 |
Patagonian Tyrant Colorhamphus parvirostris | LC | resident | 2009 | present | A3 |
Fire-eyed Diucon Xolmis pyrope | LC | resident | 2009 | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | near favourable | medium | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | - | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Artificial/Terrestrial | - | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Grassland | - | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Shrubland | - | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Wetlands (inland) | - | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1970 | Cerro Castillo | Reserva Forestal | 21 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | - | |
Forest | - | |
Grassland | - | |
Shrubland | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Ibañez River Valley (Chile). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/ibañez-river-valley-iba-chile on 23/11/2024.