The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rufous-vented Chachalaca Ortalis ruficauda | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A3 |
Orinoco Goose Neochen jubata | NT | resident | 1992-2008 | frequent | A1 |
Dwarf Cuckoo Coccycua pumila | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A3 |
Pale-headed Jacamar Brachygalba goeringi | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A3 |
Two-banded Puffbird Hypnelus bicinctus | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A3 |
Scaled Piculet Picumnus squamulatus | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A3 |
White-bearded Flycatcher Phelpsia inornata | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A3 |
Stripe-backed Wren Campylorhynchus nuchalis | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A3 |
Orinocan Saltator Saltator orenocensis | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2008 | not assessed | very high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Pollution | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Humedal La Lipa (Colombia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/humedal-la-lipa-iba-colombia on 24/11/2024.