The site was identified as important in 2020 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coscoroba Swan Coscoroba coscoroba | LC | resident | 2016-2020 | 321-387 individuals | A4, B3a |
Black-necked Swan Cygnus melancoryphus | LC | resident | 2008 | 1,000-2,499 individuals | A4i |
Chilean Flamingo Phoenicopterus chilensis | NT | winter | 2008 | 200 individuals | A1 |
Chilean Flamingo Phoenicopterus chilensis | NT | non-breeding | 2016-2020 | 13-269 individuals | B1a |
Peruvian Pelican Pelecanus thagus | NT | non-breeding | 2016-2020 | 3-31 individuals | B1a |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2020) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2020. The most recent assessment (2020) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2020 | very unfavourable | very high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Marine Intertidal | - | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Geological events | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1996 | El Yali | Reserva Nacional | 5 |
1996 | Humedal el Yali | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 4 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Neritic | major (>10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Humedal El Yali (Chile). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/humedal-el-yali-iba-chile on 23/11/2024.