The site was identified as important in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus | LC | breeding | 1994 | 775 breeding pairs | B3 |
Great Black-backed Gull Larus marinus | LC | breeding | 1994 | 240 breeding pairs | B3 |
Common Tern Sterna hirundo | LC | breeding | 1994 | 175 breeding pairs | C6 |
Sandwich Tern Thalasseus sandvicensis | LC | breeding | 1994 | 1,356 breeding pairs | A4i, B1i, B2, C6 |
Black Guillemot Cepphus grylle | LC | breeding | 1994 | 490 breeding pairs | B1ii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2000) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | favourable | very high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta | 1 | 1 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Black Guillemot Cepphus grylle | 1,900 | 1,900 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Other | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1977 | Hirsholmene | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 100 |
1981 | Waters around Hirsholmene | Major Conservation Area | 100 |
1983 | Hirsholmene | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
1992 | Frederikshavn Kommune | §3 beskyttet natur (alle søer, moser, vandløb, heder, enge mv) | 2 |
1994 | Hirsholmene | Baltic Sea Protected Area (Helcom) | 100 |
1998 | Hirsholmene; havet vest herfor og Ellinge Å's udløb | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 100 |
2005 | Waters around Hirsholmene | Baltic Sea Protected Area (HELCOM) | 100 |
2009 | Hirsholmene, havet vest herfor og Ellinge Å’s udløb | Marine Protected Area (OSPAR) | 93 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Intertidal | 100 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Hirsholmene (Denmark). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/hirsholmene-iba-denmark on 23/11/2024.