The site was identified as important in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1998) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2014) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2014 | unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Desert | good (> 90%) | poor (40-69%) | unfavourable |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Shrubland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Energy production and mining | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Black Mountain Mine | Nature Reserve | 7 |
- | Aggeneys farm | Conservation Area | 6 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Desert | Desert dunes | - |
Shrubland | Shrubland - succulent Karroo | - |
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers & streams | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 80 |
water management | 50 |
agriculture | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Haramoep and Black Mountain Mine (South Africa). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/haramoep-and-black-mountain-mine-iba-south-africa on 23/11/2024.