The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Japanese Woodpigeon Columba janthina | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A2 |
Bonin White-eye Apalopteron familiare | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A1, A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | very unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | very poor (< 40%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Geological events | likely in short term (within 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1972 | Ogasawara | 国立公園 | 100 |
1980 | Ogasawara gunto | 国指定鳥獣保護区 | 100 |
2002 | Common fishery right area(Tokyo) | 共同漁業権区域 | 9 |
2007 | Ogasawara Islands | 森林生態系保護地域 | 57 |
2011 | Ogasawara Islands | World Heritage Site (natural or mixed) | 68 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Hahajima islands (Japan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/hahajima-islands-iba-japan on 23/11/2024.