The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2009 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Smew Mergellus albellus | LC | winter (2000–2009) | 5–10 birds | C6 |
Spotted Crake Porzana porzana | LC | passage (2000–2009) | 4–8 birds | C6 |
Eurasian Bittern Botaurus stellaris | LC | winter (2000–2009) | 2–5 birds | C6 |
Common Little Bittern Ixobrychus minutus | LC | breeding (2000–2009) | 5–7 males | C6 |
Osprey Pandion haliaetus | LC | passage (2000–2009) | 2–10 birds | C6 |
Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis | LC | resident (2000–2009) | 3–5 pairs | C6 |
Grey-faced Woodpecker Picus canus | LC | breeding (2000–2009) | 2–3 pairs | C6 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2009. The most recent assessment (2009) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2009 | good | low | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Actual vs Reference (units) | % remaining | Result | ||
Smew Mergellus albellus | 10 / 10 (birds) | 100 | good | ||
Ixobrychus minutus | 6 / 3 (males) | 100 | good | ||
Picus canus | 3 / 3 (pairs) | 100 | good | ||
Common Reed-warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus | 40 / 30 (pairs) | 100 | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Haff Réimech | Natural Reserve (-) | - |
1998 | Haff Réimech | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance (IV) | 88 |
2002 | Haff Réimech (N2000) | Zones protégées d'intérêt communautaire - Zones Oiseaux ZPS (IV) | 77 |
2004 | Région de la Moselle supérieure | Zones protégées d'intérêt communautaire - Zones Habitats ZSC (IV) | 60 |
2009 | Region de la Moselle supérieure | Protected Area (-) | 79 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | 41 | Standing freshwater; Rivers and streams |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 28 | Highly improved re-seeded landscapes; Perennial crops, orchards and groves |
Shrubland | 13 | Scrub |
Grassland | 10 | Steppes and dry calcareous grassland; Humid grasslands; Mesophile grasslands |
Forest | 8 | Alluvial and very wet forest; Broadleaved deciduous woodland |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
rangeland/pastureland | 8 |
agriculture | 7 |
nature conservation and research | major (>10) |
tourism/recreation | major (>10) |
hunting | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Haff Réimech (Luxembourg). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/haff-réimech-iba-luxembourg on 23/12/2024.