The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('key species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus | LC | passage (2006–2007) | 700 individuals | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | winter (2006–2007) | min 20,000 individuals | A4iii |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2018) is shown below.
IBA conservation status | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2018 | near favourable | not assessed | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | population | medium |
State (condition of the key species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Actual vs Reference (units) | % remaining | Result | ||
White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala | 1 / 1 (individuals) | 100 | favourable | ||
Common Pochard Aythya ferina | 2,500 / 3,000 (individuals) | 84 | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the key species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no deterioration (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no deterioration (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no deterioration (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Pollution | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no deterioration (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the key species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | 75 | Standing fresh water; Water-fringe vegetation |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 10 | Forestry plantations; Other urban & industrial areas; Ruderal land |
Desert | 10 | Desert & semi-desert - sandy |
Shrubland | 5 | Low bushes |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
water management | 40 |
tourism/recreation | 30 |
fisheries/aquaculture | 15 |
not utilised | 10 |
agriculture | 5 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2025) Important Bird Area factsheet: Gurtli (Turkmenistan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/gurtli-iba-turkmenistan on 08/01/2025.