The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus | LC | passage | 2006-2007 | 700 individuals | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | winter | 2006-2007 | min 20,000 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2018) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2018 | near favourable | not assessed | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala | 1 | 1 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Common Pochard Aythya ferina | 3,000 | 2,500 | individuals | 84 | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Pollution | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing fresh water, Water-fringe vegetation | 75 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Forestry plantations, Other urban & industrial areas, Ruderal land | 10 |
Desert | Desert & semi-desert - sandy | 10 |
Shrubland | Low bushes | 5 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
water management | 40 |
tourism/recreation | 30 |
fisheries/aquaculture | 15 |
not utilised | 10 |
agriculture | 5 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Gurtli (Turkmenistan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/gurtli-iba-turkmenistan on 24/11/2024.