The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
White-tailed Sea-eagle Haliaeetus albicilla | LC | winter | - | 15 individuals | C1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | very unfavourable | very high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | unknown |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
White-tailed Sea-eagle Haliaeetus albicilla | 15 | 0 | individuals | 0 | very unfavourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine | good (> 90%) | very poor (< 40%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Very little or no conservation action taking place | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1991 | Dzukija | National Park | 100 |
2005 | Grybaulios žuvininkystės tvenkiniai | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine | 86 | |
Forest | Mixed woodland, Native coniferous woodland | 5 |
Grassland | 5 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Other urban and industrial areas | 4 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
fisheries/aquaculture | 95 |
agriculture | 3 |
rangeland/pastureland | 2 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Grybaulia fish-farm (Lithuania). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/grybaulia-fish-farm-iba-lithuania on 24/11/2024.