The site was identified as important in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grey Plover Pluvialis squatarola | VU | winter | - | 2,029 individuals | A4i |
Charadrius mongolus | NR | winter | - | 476 individuals | A4i |
Sanderling Calidris alba | LC | winter | - | 2,273 individuals | A4i |
Little Tern Sternula albifrons | LC | winter | - | 1,883 individuals | A4i |
Common Tern Sterna hirundo | LC | winter | - | 20,000 individuals | A4i |
Lesser Crested Tern Thalasseus bengalensis | LC | non-breeding | - | 5,895 individuals | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | non-breeding | - | 20,000-49,999 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1998) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2020) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2020 | not assessed | very high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | unknown |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1971 | Bazaruto | National Park | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | 37 | |
Shrubland | 28 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 16 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 10 | |
Forest | 6 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Greater Bazaruto (Mozambique). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/greater-bazaruto-iba-mozambique on 23/11/2024.