The site was identified as important in 2009 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pied Oystercatcher Haematopus longirostris | LC | resident | 1985-2007 | 992 individuals | A4i |
Red-capped Plover Charadrius ruficapillus | LC | resident | 1985-2007 | 1,649 individuals | A4i |
Charadrius mongolus | NR | non-breeding | 1985-2007 | 8,461 individuals | A4i |
Far Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascariensis | EN | non-breeding | 1985-2007 | 12,803 individuals | A4i |
Bar-tailed Godwit Limosa lapponica | NT | non-breeding | 1985-2007 | 43,987 individuals | A4i |
Great Knot Calidris tenuirostris | EN | non-breeding | 1985-2007 | 5,612 individuals | A4i |
Red-necked Stint Calidris ruficollis | NT | non-breeding | 1985-2007 | 8,100 individuals | A4i |
Grey-tailed Tattler Tringa brevipes | LC | non-breeding | 1985-2007 | 11,275 individuals | A4i |
Mangrove Honeyeater Gavicalis fasciogularis | LC | resident | 1985-2008 | common | A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2009) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2009. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2008 | not assessed | medium | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1900 | Hervey Bay - Tin Can Bay | Dugong Protection Area (A) | 73 |
1992 | Fraser Island | World Heritage Site (natural or mixed) | 12 |
1995 | Great Sandy | Conservation Park | 1 |
1999 | Great Sandy Strait (including Great Sandy Strait, Tin Can Bay and Tin Can Inlet) | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 96 |
2006 | Great Sandy | Marine Park | 79 |
2008 | Maaroom | Fish Habitat Area (A) | 27 |
2008 | Kauri Creek | Fish Habitat Area (A) | 8 |
2008 | Tin Can Inlet | Fish Habitat Area (A) | 2 |
2009 | Great Sandy | UNESCO-MAB Biosphere Reserve | 100 |
2009 | Susan River | Fish Habitat Area (A) | 5 |
2011 | Great Sandy | National Park | 6 |
2014 | Great Sandy 1 | Conservation Park | 1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Intertidal | 60 | |
Forest | Mangroves | 20 |
Marine Neritic | 20 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | major (>10) |
fisheries/aquaculture | minor (<10) |
tourism/recreation | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Great Sandy Strait (Australia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/great-sandy-strait-iba-australia on 22/11/2024.