The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Western Tragopan Tragopan melanocephalus | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2 |
Cheer Pheasant Catreus wallichii | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2 |
White-cheeked Tit Aegithalos leucogenys | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
Orange Bullfinch Pyrrhula aurantiaca | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
Spectacled Finch Callacanthis burtoni | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2003 | not assessed | high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1958 | Pin Valley | National Park | 3 |
1962 | Great Himalayan | National Park | 100 |
1994 | Sainj | Sanctuary | - |
2014 | Great Himalayan National Park Conservation Area | World Heritage Site (natural or mixed) | 80 |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
SAHARA (Great Himalayan National Park) | 0 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Grassland | - | |
Shrubland | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Great Himalayan National Park (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/great-himalayan-national-park-iba-india on 23/11/2024.