The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | breeding | 2004 | 2 breeding pairs | A1 |
Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca | VU | breeding | 2004 | 3 breeding pairs | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | unfavourable | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | poor (40-69%) | unfavourable |
Artificial/Terrestrial | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Grassland | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Ozero Kolyvanovskoe | Nature Monument | - |
- | Zmeinogorskiy Rudnik | Nature Monument | - |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | 53 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 30 | |
Forest | 16 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 1 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 53 |
forestry | 16 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Gornaya Kolyvan' (Russia (Central Asian)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/gornaya-kolyvan-iba-russia-(central-asian) on 23/11/2024.