The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Himalayan Snowcock Tetraogallus himalayensis | LC | resident | 2004 | 3-15 breeding pairs | A3 |
Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus | EN | resident | 2004 | 2-5 breeding pairs | A1 |
Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis | NT | resident | 2004 | 5-10 breeding pairs | A3 |
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus | NT | resident | 2004 | 3-5 breeding pairs | A1 |
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug | EN | breeding | 2004 | 1-5 breeding pairs | A1 |
Yellow-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus | LC | resident | 2004 | 5-15 breeding pairs | A3 |
Hume's Lark Calandrella acutirostris | LC | breeding | 2004 | present | A3 |
Sulphur-bellied Warbler Phylloscopus griseolus | LC | breeding | 2004 | present | A3 |
Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A3 |
White-winged Redstart Phoenicurus erythrogastrus | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A3 |
Altai Accentor Prunella himalayana | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A3 |
Alpine Accentor Prunella collaris | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A3 |
Brown Accentor Prunella fulvescens | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A3 |
White-winged Snowfinch Montifringilla nivalis | LC | resident | 2004 | 50-500 breeding pairs | A3 |
Water Pipit Anthus spinoletta | LC | breeding | 2004 | present | A3 |
Red-mantled Rosefinch Carpodacus rhodochlamys | LC | breeding | 2004 | present | A3 |
Great Rosefinch Carpodacus rubicilla | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A3 |
Brandt's Mountain-finch Leucosticte brandti | LC | resident | 2004 | 50-200 breeding pairs | A3 |
Red-fronted Serin Serinus pusillus | LC | breeding | 2004 | 20-100 breeding pairs | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2006 | not assessed | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | unknown |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | Unknown | Unknown | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | Alpine, subalpine & boreal, Mesophile grassland & tall grass steppe | 45 |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | Inland cliffs, Scree, boulders & bare rocky areas | 30 |
Forest | Native coniferous, Treeline ecotone | 15 |
Shrubland | Scrub | 9 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Highly improved reseeded grasslands | 1 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
tourism/recreation | 100 |
hunting | 30 |
forestry | 25 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Gorge Tash-Rabat (Kyrgyzstan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/gorge-tash-rabat-iba-kyrgyzstan on 22/11/2024.