The site was identified as important in 2003 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Great Curassow Crax rubra | VU | breeding | 2006 | 1,000-2,499 individuals | A1 |
Plumbeous Hawk Cryptoleucopteryx plumbea | NT | breeding | 2006 | 50-249 individuals | A1 |
Lattice-tailed Trogon Trogon clathratus | LC | resident | 2006 | unknown | A2 |
Great Green Macaw Ara ambiguus | CR | breeding | 2006 | 20 individuals | A1 |
Black-crowned Pittasoma Pittasoma michleri | LC | resident | 2006 | unknown | A2 |
Bare-necked Umbrellabird Cephalopterus glabricollis | EN | non-breeding | 2006 | 250-999 individuals | A1 |
Three-wattled Bellbird Procnias tricarunculatus | VU | non-breeding | 2006 | 250-999 individuals | A1 |
Tawny-capped Euphonia Euphonia anneae | LC | resident | 2006 | unknown | A2 |
Golden-winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera | NT | winter | 2006 | 2,500-9,999 individuals | A1 |
Cerulean Warbler Setophaga cerulea | NT | passage | 2006 | 2,500-9,999 individuals | A1 |
Sulphur-rumped Tanager Heterospingus rubrifrons | LC | resident | 2006 | unknown | A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2003) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2003. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | near favourable | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | unknown |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | good (> 90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Energy production and mining | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Donoso | Area de Uso MĂșltiple | 50 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | major (>10) | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | minor (<10) |
rangeland/pastureland | minor (<10) |
hunting | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Golfo de los Mosquitos Forests (Panama). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/golfo-de-los-mosquitos-forests-iba-panama on 22/11/2024.