UZ042
Gissar State Nature Reserve


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Himalayan Snowcock Tetraogallus himalayensis LC resident (1990–2005) 10–650 birds A3
Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis NT resident (1980–2007) 1–4 birds A3
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus NT resident (1980–2007) 3–20 birds A1
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug EN breeding (1996–2007) 1–2 birds A1
Yellow-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus LC resident (1996–2005) 4–40 birds A3
Hume's Lark Calandrella acutirostris LC breeding (1990–2007) 3–15 birds A3
Sulphur-bellied Warbler Phylloscopus griseolus LC breeding (1996–2005) 1–4 birds A3
Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria LC breeding (1996–2005) 1–3 birds A3
White-winged Redstart Phoenicurus erythrogastrus LC breeding (1996–2005) 1–3 birds A3
Alpine Accentor Prunella collaris LC breeding (1990–2005) 1–4 birds A3
Brown Accentor Prunella fulvescens LC breeding (1996–2005) 1–4 birds A3
Water Pipit Anthus spinoletta LC breeding (1990–2005) 1–3 birds A3
White-winged Grosbeak Mycerobas carnipes LC resident (1996–2005) 3–8 birds A3
Red-fronted Serin Serinus pusillus LC breeding (1966–2005) 2–5 birds A3

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2008 not assessed low low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes unset medium

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Agricultural expansion and intensification happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) low
Biological resource use happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Most of area (50–90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) Not assessed Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not compre­hensive and are limited by resources and capacity low

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
1983 Gissarskiy State Nature Reserve (Ia) 8

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) 32 Inland cliffs; Scree, boulders & bare rocky areas
Grassland 26 Humid
Forest 25 Broadleaved deciduous; Mixed
Artificial/Terrestrial 9 Arable land; Forestry plantations
Shrubland 4 Juniper scrub; Low bushes
Wetlands (inland) 4 Rivers & streams; Water-fringe vegetation
Caves and Subterranean Habitats (non-aquatic) -

Land use

Land use % of IBA
nature conservation and research 60
forestry 20
agriculture 10
military 10


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Gissar State Nature Reserve (Uzbekistan). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/gissar-state-nature-reserve-iba-uzbekistan on 23/12/2024.