The site was identified as important in 2001 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marbled Duck Marmaronetta angustirostris | NT | breeding | - | 60 breeding pairs | A1, A4i |
Marbled Duck Marmaronetta angustirostris | NT | winter | - | 150-200 individuals | A1, A4i |
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | NT | winter | - | common | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2001) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2001. The most recent assessment (2009) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2009 | very unfavourable | medium | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Marbled Duck Marmaronetta angustirostris | 60 | 11 | individuals | 19 | very unfavourable |
Marbled Duck Marmaronetta angustirostris | 1 | 22 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | 1 | 54 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2007 | Zones humides oasiennes de Kebili | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 22 |
2007 | Zones humides oasiennes de Kebili | Wetland Zone of National Importance | 22 |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
AAO/ Tunisian Ornithology Group (GTO) | 2000 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
hunting | - |
other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Ghidma (Tunisia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/ghidma-iba-tunisia on 23/11/2024.