The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | LC | winter (2004) | present | A4i |
Bean Goose Anser fabalis | LC | non-breeding (2004) | present | A4i |
Common Shelduck Tadorna tadorna | LC | non-breeding (2004) | present | A4i |
Baikal Teal Sibirionetta formosa | LC | winter (2004) | present | A1, A4i |
Mallard Anas platyrhynchos | LC | non-breeding (2004) | present | A4i |
Eastern Spot-billed Duck Anas zonorhyncha | LC | resident (2004) | present | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | unknown (2004) | min 20,000 birds | A4iii |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2011) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2011 | good | high | very low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Actual vs Reference (units) | % remaining | Result | ||
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | 2,419 / 2,503 (birds) | 97 | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (>4 years) | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Some of area covered (10–49%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | very low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2000 | Wando-Doam Bay | 환경보전해역 (Ia) | 100 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | minor (<10) | Rice paddies |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Gangjin Bay (South Korea). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/gangjin-bay-iba-south-korea on 23/12/2024.