The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | LC | winter | 2004 | present | A4i |
Bean Goose Anser fabalis | LC | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A4i |
Common Shelduck Tadorna tadorna | LC | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A4i |
Baikal Teal Sibirionetta formosa | LC | winter | 2004 | present | A1, A4i |
Mallard Anas platyrhynchos | LC | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A4i |
Eastern Spot-billed Duck Anas zonorhyncha | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | unknown | 2004 | min 20,000 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2011) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2011 | favourable | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | 2,503 | 2,419 | individuals | 97 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2000 | Wando-Doam Bay | 환경보전해역 | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Rice paddies | minor (<10) |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Gangjin Bay (South Korea). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/gangjin-bay-iba-south-korea on 22/11/2024.