The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2011 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Common Crane Grus grus | LC | passage (2009) | max 48,000 birds | A4i, B1i, C2 |
Common Crane Grus grus | LC | winter (2009) | max 25,000 birds | A4i, B1i, C2 |
Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax | NT | resident (2006) | 40–115 birds | A1, C1, C6 |
Great Bustard Otis tarda | EN | non-breeding (2011) | max 158 birds | A1, C1 |
Great Bustard Otis tarda | EN | resident (2011) | 21–55 birds | A1, C1 |
Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta | LC | non-breeding (2009) | min 100 birds | C6 |
Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta | LC | breeding (2009) | 25–30 pairs | C6 |
Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus | LC | non-breeding (2009) | min 350 birds | C6 |
Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus | LC | breeding (2009) | 25–50 pairs | C6 |
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida | LC | resident (2007) | present | C6 |
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida | LC | passage (2009) | max 35 birds | C6 |
Common Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica | LC | resident (2009) | min 20 pairs | C6 |
Montagu's Harrier Circus pygargus | LC | breeding (2006) | min 14 pairs | C6 |
Dupont's Lark Chersophilus duponti | VU | resident (2007) | min 31 males | A1, C1 |
A4iv Species group - soaring birds/cranes | n/a | passage (2009) | max 48,000 birds | A4iv, B1iv, C5 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2011. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | very poor | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Actual vs Reference (units) | % remaining | Result | ||
Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina | 2 / 150 (birds) | 2 | very poor | ||
Common Pochard Aythya ferina | 0 / 150 (pairs) | 0 | very poor | ||
Gadwall Mareca strepera | 0 / 20 (pairs) | 0 | very poor | ||
Eurasian Coot Fulica atra | 0 / 1,200 (birds) | 0 | very poor | ||
Common Crane Grus grus | 50,000 / 50,000 (birds) | 100 | good | ||
Himantopus himantopus | 20 / 2,800 (pairs) | 1 | very poor | ||
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida | 0 / 100 (pairs) | 0 | very poor | ||
Sterna nilotica | 0 / 25 (pairs) | 0 | very poor | ||
Montagu's Harrier Circus pygargus | 2 / 10 (pairs) | 20 | very poor |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Artificial/Terrestrial | - | moderate (70–90%) | very poor |
Grassland | - | good (>90%) | good |
Wetlands (inland) | - | good (>90%) | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | very high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Pollution | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Most of area (50–90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | No management plan exists, but the management planning process has begun | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1985 | Laguna de Gallocanta | National Game Reserve (IV) | 23 |
2006 | Laguna de Gallocanta | Reserva Natural Dirigida (IV) | 7 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | 70 | Arable land; Ruderal land |
Grassland | 15 | Humid grasslands; Mesophile grasslands |
Wetlands (inland) | 15 | Standing brackish and salt water; Water fringe vegetation |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 26 |
hunting | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Gallocanta lake (Spain). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/gallocanta-lake-iba-spain on 24/12/2024.