ES095
Gallocanta lake This is an IBA in Danger! 


IBA Justification

The site was identified as important in 2011 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List1 Season Year(s) Size IBA criteria
Common Crane Grus grus LC passage 2009 max 48,000 individuals A4i, B1i, C2
Common Crane Grus grus LC winter 2009 max 25,000 individuals A4i, B1i, C2
Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax NT resident 2006 40-115 individuals A1, C1, C6
Great Bustard Otis tarda EN non-breeding 2011 max 158 individuals A1, C1
Great Bustard Otis tarda EN resident 2011 21-55 individuals A1, C1
Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta LC non-breeding 2009 min 100 individuals C6
Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta LC breeding 2009 25-30 breeding pairs C6
Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus LC non-breeding 2009 min 350 individuals C6
Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus LC breeding 2009 25-50 breeding pairs C6
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida LC resident 2007 present C6
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida LC passage 2009 max 35 individuals C6
Common Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica LC resident 2009 min 20 breeding pairs C6
Montagu's Harrier Circus pygargus LC breeding 2006 min 14 breeding pairs C6
Dupont's Lark Chersophilus duponti VU resident 2007 min 31 males A1, C1
A4iv Species group - soaring birds/cranes n/a passage 2009 max 48,000 individuals A4iv, B1iv, C5

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2011) may differ.


IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2011. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2016 very unfavourable very high low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes population good

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Reference Actual Units % remaining Result
Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina 150 2 individuals 2 very unfavourable
Common Pochard Aythya ferina 150 0 breeding pairs 0 very unfavourable
Gadwall Mareca strepera 20 0 breeding pairs 0 very unfavourable
Eurasian Coot Fulica atra 1,200 0 individuals 0 very unfavourable
Common Crane Grus grus 50,000 50,000 individuals 100 favourable
Himantopus himantopus 2,800 20 breeding pairs 1 very unfavourable
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida 100 0 breeding pairs 0 very unfavourable
Sterna nilotica 25 0 breeding pairs 0 very unfavourable
Montagu's Harrier Circus pygargus 10 2 breeding pairs 20 very unfavourable

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Artificial/Terrestrial - moderate (70-90%) very unfavourable
Grassland - good (> 90%) favourable
Wetlands (inland) - good (> 90%) favourable

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Agricultural expansion and intensification happening now whole area/population (>90%) very rapid to severe deterioration very high
Human intrusions and disturbance happening now some of area/population (10-49%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Pollution happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Climate change and severe weather happening now whole area/population (>90%) slow but significant deterioration high
Biological resource use happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Natural system modifications happening now small area/few individuals (<10%) very rapid to severe deterioration low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas Management plan Other action Result
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun Very little or no conservation action taking place low

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation % overlap with IBA
1985 Laguna de Gallocanta National Game Reserve 23
1989 Cuenca de Gallocanta Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) 54
1994 Laguna de Gallocanta Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance 23
1998 Laguna de Gallocanta Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) 10
2000 Sierras de Pardos y Santa Cruz Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) 3
2000 Montes de La Cuenca de Gallocanta Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) 1
2000 Los Romerales - Cerropozuelo Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) 1
2000 Hoces de Torralba - Río Piedra Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) 1
2000 Balsa Grande y Balsa Pequeña Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) <1
2001 Parameras de Blancas Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) 2
2006 Laguna de Gallocanta Reserva Natural Dirigida 7

Habitats

Habitat1 Habitat detail % of IBA
Artificial/Terrestrial Arable land, Ruderal land 70
Grassland Humid grasslands, Mesophile grasslands 15
Wetlands (inland) Standing brackish and salt water, Water fringe vegetation 15
1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use

Land use % of IBA
agriculture 26
hunting -
tourism/recreation -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Gallocanta lake (Spain). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/gallocanta-lake-iba-spain on 23/11/2024.