Data Zone
The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:| Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maleo Macrocephalon maleo | CR | resident (2004) | present | A1, A2 |
| Sulawesi Ground Dove Gallicolumba tristigmata | LC | resident (2000) | present | A2 |
| Grey-headed Imperial-pigeon Ducula radiata | LC | resident (2000) | present | A2 |
| Heinrich's Nightjar Eurostopodus diabolicus | LC | resident (2004) | present | A1, A2 |
| Milky Stork Mycteria cinerea | EN | resident (2004) | present | A1 |
| Sulawesi Dwarf-kingfisher Ceyx fallax | LC | resident (2000) | present | A2 |
| Trichoglossus flavoviridis | NR | resident (2000) | present | A2 |
| Sulphur-bellied Whistler Pachycephala sulfuriventer | LC | resident (2000) | present | A2 |
| Pied Cuckooshrike Coracina bicolor | NT | resident (2000) | present | A2 |
| Rusty-bellied Fantail Rhipidura teysmanni | LC | resident (2000) | present | A2 |
| Pale-bellied White-eye Zosterops consobrinorum | LC | resident (2000) | present | A2 |
| Rufous-throated Flycatcher Ficedula rufigula | NT | resident (2000) | present | A2 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
| IBA conservation assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
| 2016 | poor | very high | low |
| Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
| yes | habitat | good | |
| State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
| Forest | moderate (70–90%) | moderate (70–90%) | poor |
| Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | very high |
| Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
| Energy production and mining | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
| Residential and commercial development | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
| Natural system modifications | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
| Climate change and severe weather | likely in short term (<4 years) | whole of population/area (>90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
| Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
| Geological events | likely in long term (>4 years) | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | medium |
| Pollution | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
| Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
| Transportation and service corridors | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
| Other | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
| Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
| Some of area covered (10–49%) | A management plan exists, but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
| Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | Faruhumpenai | Cagar Alam (Ia) | 56 |
| - | Kalaena | Cagar Alam (Ia) | <1 |
| 1979 | Pegunungan Faruhumpenai | Nature Reserve (Ia) | 56 |
| 1979 | Danau Matano | Taman Wisata Alam (V) | 21 |
| 1999 | Ponda-Ponda | Cagar Alam (Ia) | <1 |
| Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
|---|---|---|
| Forest | 78 | |
| Wetlands (inland) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Feruhumpenai - Matano (Indonesia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/feruhumpenai--matano-iba-indonesia on 26/12/2024.