The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maleo Macrocephalon maleo | CR | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2 |
Sulawesi Ground Dove Gallicolumba tristigmata | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Grey-headed Imperial-pigeon Ducula radiata | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Heinrich's Nightjar Eurostopodus diabolicus | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2 |
Milky Stork Mycteria cinerea | EN | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Sulawesi Dwarf-kingfisher Ceyx fallax | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Trichoglossus flavoviridis | NR | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Sulphur-bellied Whistler Pachycephala sulfuriventer | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Pied Cuckooshrike Coracina bicolor | NT | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Rusty-bellied Fantail Rhipidura teysmanni | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Pale-bellied White-eye Zosterops consobrinorum | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Rufous-throated Flycatcher Ficedula rufigula | NT | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | unfavourable | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in short term (within 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Geological events | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Other | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Faruhumpenai | Cagar Alam | 56 |
- | Kalaena | Cagar Alam | <1 |
1979 | Pegunungan Faruhumpenai | Nature Reserve | 56 |
1979 | Danau Matano | Taman Wisata Alam | 21 |
1999 | Ponda-Ponda | Cagar Alam | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | 78 | |
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Feruhumpenai - Matano (Indonesia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/feruhumpenai--matano-iba-indonesia on 25/11/2024.