The site was identified as important in 2012 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Red-footed Booby Sula sula | LC | breeding | 1992 | 6,000-10,000 individuals | A4ii |
Black Noddy Anous minutus | LC | breeding | 1979 | 20,000 individuals | A4i |
Gygis alba | NR | breeding | 1992 | 6,000-10,000 individuals | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | breeding | 1979 | 23,050-25,100 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2012) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2012. The most recent assessment (2018) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2018 | unfavourable | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Fanna Island | Bird Area | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Beach and atoll forest | major (>10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | major (>10) |
other | major (>10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Fana Island (Palau). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/fana-island-iba-palau on 23/11/2024.