The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chestnut-breasted Partridge Arborophila mandellii | NT | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2, A3 |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | CR | non-breeding | 2002 | present | A1 |
Slender-billed Vulture Gyps tenuirostris | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
Rufous-necked Hornbill Aceros nipalensis | VU | resident | 2002 | present | A1, A3 |
White-naped Yuhina Yuhina bakeri | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2, A3 |
Hoary-throated Barwing Sibia nipalensis | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2, A3 |
Beautiful Nuthatch Sitta formosa | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A3 |
Rusty-bellied Shortwing Brachypteryx hyperythra | NT | resident | 2002 | present | A1, A2, A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2003 | not assessed | high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1984 | Fambong Lho | Sanctuary | 96 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Fambong Lho Wildlife Sanctuary - Himalayan Zoological Park - Ratey Chu Reserve Forest (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/fambong-lho-wildlife-sanctuary--himalayan-zoological-park--ratey-chu-reserve-forest-iba-india on 22/11/2024.