The site was identified as important in 2011 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Barbary Partridge Alectoris barbara | LC | resident | 2009 | present | B2, C6 |
Cory's Shearwater Calonectris borealis | LC | breeding | 2007 | min 150 breeding pairs | C7 |
Osprey Pandion haliaetus | LC | resident | 2011 | 1 breeding pairs | C6 |
Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus | EN | resident | 2008 | min 1 breeding pairs | A1, C1, C6 |
Eleonora's Falcon Falco eleonorae | LC | non-breeding | 2007 | min 50 individuals | B2, C6 |
Eleonora's Falcon Falco eleonorae | LC | breeding | 2007 | present | B2, C6 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2011) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2011. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | favourable | very high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Osprey Pandion haliaetus | 1 | 1 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus | 1 | 1 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Very little or no conservation action taking place | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1987 | ArchipiƩlago de Chinijo | Parque Natural | 97 |
1996 | ArchipiƩlago Chinijo | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 77 |
2006 | Islotes del norte de Lanzarote y Famara | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 77 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Desert | Semidesert | - |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | |
Marine Intertidal | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
military | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Famara crag (Spain). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/famara-crag-iba-spain on 23/11/2024.