FI025
Elimyssalo


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Black Grouse Lyrurus tetrix LC resident (1993) 51–100 pairs B2, C6
Smew Mergellus albellus LC breeding (1996) 1–5 pairs A3
Horned Grebe Podiceps auritus VU breeding (1993) 1–3 pairs A3
Common Greenshank Tringa nebularia LC breeding (1993) 11–50 pairs A3
Northern Hawk-owl Surnia ulula LC breeding (1993) 1–5 pairs A3
Great Grey Owl Strix nebulosa LC breeding (1993) 1–5 pairs A3
Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus LC resident (1993) 51–100 pairs B2, C6
Siberian Jay Perisoreus infaustus LC resident (1993) 51–100 pairs A3, B2
Siberian Tit Poecile cinctus LC resident (1993) 11–50 pairs A3
Arctic Warbler Phylloscopus borealis LC breeding (1993) 1–5 pairs A3
Bohemian Waxwing Bombycilla garrulus LC breeding (1993) 11–50 pairs A3
Brambling Fringilla montifringilla LC breeding (1993) 501–1,000 pairs A3
Parrot Crossbill Loxia pytyopsittacus LC breeding (1993) 6–10 pairs A3
Two-barred Crossbill Loxia leucoptera LC breeding (1993) 11–50 pairs A3
Rustic Bunting Emberiza rustica VU breeding (1993) 251–500 pairs A3

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2010 very poor high medium
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes population medium

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Actual vs Reference (units) % remaining Result
Black Grouse Lyrurus tetrix 15 / 50 (pairs) 30 very poor

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Biological resource use happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) high
Natural system modifications past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation A management plan exists, but it is out of date or not compre­hensive Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not compre­hensive and are limited by resources and capacity medium

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
1990 Elimyssalon luonnonsuojelualue (Ystävyyden puisto) Valtion luonnonsuojelualue (Ib) 87

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Wetlands (inland) 52 Standing freshwater; Raised bogs
Forest 48

Land use

Land use % of IBA
unknown -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Elimyssalo (Finland). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/elimyssalo-iba-finland on 23/12/2024.