The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blyth's Tragopan Tragopan blythii | VU | resident | 2002 | present | A1, A2 |
Ward's Trogon Harpactes wardi | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2 |
Rufous-necked Hornbill Aceros nipalensis | VU | resident | 2002 | present | A1 |
Broad-billed Warbler Tickellia hodgsoni | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2 |
White-naped Yuhina Yuhina bakeri | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2 |
Marsh Babbler Pellorneum palustre | VU | resident | 2002 | present | A1, A2 |
Beautiful Sibia Heterophasia pulchella | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2 |
Hoary-throated Barwing Sibia nipalensis | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2 |
Streak-throated Barwing Sibia waldeni | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2 |
Beautiful Nuthatch Sitta formosa | VU | resident | 2002 | present | A1 |
Rusty-bellied Shortwing Brachypteryx hyperythra | NT | resident | 2002 | present | A1, A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | favourable | low | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Unknown | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1989 | Eagle Nest | Sanctuary | 68 |
1989 | Sessa Orchid | Sanctuary | 32 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Eaglenest and Sessa Sanctuaries (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/eaglenest-and-sessa-sanctuaries-iba-india on 22/11/2024.