• Summary
• Text account
• Data table and detailed info
• Map
• Reference and further resources

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2002 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:

Species	Red List	Season (year/s of estimate)	Size	IBA criteria
Green Peafowl Pavo muticus	EN	resident (1998)	4–6 birds	A1, A3
Germain's Peacock-Pheasant Polyplectron germaini	VU	resident (1998)	present	A1
Pale-capped Pigeon Columba punicea	VU	resident (1998)	5 birds	A1
Yellow-footed Green-pigeon Treron phoenicopterus	LC	resident (2000)	present	A3
Indian Nightjar Caprimulgus asiaticus	LC	resident (2000)	present	A3
Red-headed Vulture Sarcogyps calvus	CR	non-breeding (1998)	1 birds	A1, A3
Great Hornbill Buceros bicornis	VU	resident (1998)	18 birds	A1
Lineated Barbet Psilopogon lineatus	LC	resident (1998)	present	A3
Small Minivet Pericrocotus cinnamomeus	LC	resident (2000)	present	A3
Indochinese Cuckooshrike Lalage polioptera	LC	resident (2000)	present	A3
Common Woodshrike Tephrodornis pondicerianus	LC	resident (2000)	present	A3
White-browed Fantail Rhipidura aureola	LC	resident (2000)	present	A3
Racquet-tailed Treepie Crypsirina temia	LC	resident (2000)	present	A3
Sooty-headed Bulbul Pycnonotus aurigaster	LC	resident (2000)	present	A3
Chestnut-tailed Starling Sturnia malabarica	LC	resident (2000)	present	A3
Plain-backed Sparrow Passer flaveolus	LC	resident (2000)	present	A3

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2002. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat	Quantity (% remaining)	Quality (% carrying capacity)	Result
Forest	-	-	poor

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat	Timing	Scope	Severity	Result
Agricultural expansion and intensification	happe­ning now	some of popul­ation/area (10–49%)	slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations)	medium
Biological resource use	happe­ning now	some of popul­ation/area (10–49%)	slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations)	medium

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation	Planning	Action	Result
Most of area (50–90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species)	A compre­hensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species	Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not compre­hensive and are limited by resources and capacity	medium

Year	Protected Area	Designation (management category)	% coverage of IBA
-	Ea So	Nature Reserve (-)	-

Habitat	% of IBA	Habitat detail
Forest	57	Semi-evergreen rain forest (tropical); Moist deciduous forest (tropical)
Grassland	-

Land use	% of IBA
not utilised	100

---

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Ea So (Vietnam). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/ea-so-iba-vietnam on 23/12/2024.