The site was identified as important in 2006 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus | NT | resident | 1990-2006 | 1-6 individuals | A1 |
European Roller Coracias garrulus | LC | breeding | 2006 | 5-70 individuals | A1 |
Rufous-naped Tit Periparus rufonuchalis | LC | resident | 2006 | 1-7 individuals | A3 |
Azure Tit Cyanistes cyanus | LC | breeding | 2006 | 1 adults | A3 |
Hume's Lark Calandrella acutirostris | LC | breeding | 2006 | 1-8 individuals | A3 |
Sulphur-bellied Warbler Phylloscopus griseolus | LC | breeding | 1973-2006 | present | A3 |
Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria | LC | resident | 2006 | 1 individuals | A3 |
Blue-capped Redstart Phoenicurus coeruleocephala | LC | breeding | 1973-2006 | 2-24 adults | A3 |
White-winged Grosbeak Mycerobas carnipes | LC | resident | 2006 | 1-4 individuals | A3 |
Red-fronted Serin Serinus pusillus | LC | resident | 2006 | 1 individuals | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2006) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2006. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2006 | not assessed | high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1926 | Zaaminskiy | State Nature Reserve | 11 |
1976 | Zaamin | National Park | 23 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | 50 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 17 | |
Forest | 17 | |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | 8 | |
Shrubland | 8 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 20 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Dzhum-Dzhum (Uzbekistan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/dzhum-dzhum-iba-uzbekistan on 22/11/2024.