The site was identified as important in 2016 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common Pochard Aythya ferina | VU | passage | 2012-2016 | 50-249 individuals | A1 |
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus | NT | passage | 2012-2015 | 5-700 individuals | A1, A4i |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2016) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2016. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | not assessed | high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Energy production and mining | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1976 | Dzheiran Ecocentre | Breeding Reserve | 51 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Desert | 44 | |
Shrubland | 39 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 14 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 2 | |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | 1 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 70 |
agriculture | 23 |
other | 5 |
urban/industrial/transport | 2 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Dzheiran Ecocentre (Uzbekistan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/dzheiran-ecocentre-iba-uzbekistan on 24/11/2024.