The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wattled Crane Bugeranus carunculatus | VU | resident (1996) | 25 pairs | A1 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | very poor | very high | very low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | moderate (70–90%) | very poor (<40%) | very poor |
Grassland | poor (40–69%) | very poor (<40%) | very poor |
Forest | very poor (<40%) | poor (40–69%) | very poor |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | very high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | very high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Pollution | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Energy production and mining | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Little/none of area covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | very low |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
Daviot Site Support Group | 2004 |
Shashe Site Support Group | 2004 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Shrubland | 68 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 17 | |
Forest | 13 | |
Grassland | major (>10) | Grassland - edaphic, dry; Grassland - edaphic, wet |
Wetlands (inland) | - | Artificial wetlands; Ephemeral pools and wetlands; Rivers & streams |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
water management | - |
other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Driefontein grasslands (Zimbabwe). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/driefontein-grasslands-iba-zimbabwe on 27/12/2024.