The site was identified as important in 2001 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Violet Turaco Musophaga violacea | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Red-throated Bee-eater Merops bulocki | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Blue-bellied Roller Coracias cyanogaster | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Bearded Barbet Pogonornis dubius | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Senegal Parrot Poicephalus senegalus | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Yellow-billed Shrike Lanius corvinus | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Piapiac Ptilostomus afer | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Purple Starling Lamprotornis purpureus | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
White-crowned Robin-chat Cossypha albicapillus | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Lavender Waxbill Glaucestrilda coerulescens | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Black-rumped Waxbill Estrilda troglodytes | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2001) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2001. The most recent assessment (2009) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2009 | favourable | medium | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Violet Turaco Musophaga violacea | 25 | 22 | breeding pairs | 88 | near favourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1937 | Diefoula | Classified Forest | 75 |
1955 | Logoniegue | Classified Forest | 25 |
2009 | La Forêt Classée et Réserve Partielle de Faune Comoé-Léraba | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 76 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | 71 | |
Shrubland | 26 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 1 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Diéfoula - Logoniégué forest (Burkina Faso). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/diéfoula--logoniégué-forest-iba-burkina-faso on 22/11/2024.