The site was identified as important in 2009 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Red-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax | LC | breeding | 2002 | 105 breeding pairs | B1iii, B2, C6 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2009) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2009. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2003 | near favourable | low | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Red-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax | 118 | 105 | breeding pairs | 89 | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1996 | Mount Brandon SAC | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 17 |
1999 | Tralee Bay and Magharees Peninsula; West to Cloghane SAC | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 6 |
2009 | Tralee Bay and Magharees Peninsula, West To Cloghane | Marine Protected Area (OSPAR) | 6 |
2010 | Dingle Peninsula SPA | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 20 |
2011 | Tralee Bay Complex SPA | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | 50 | |
Grassland | Mesophile grasslands | 30 |
Shrubland | Heathland | 20 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 50 |
not utilised | 50 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Dingle peninsula (Ireland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/dingle-peninsula-iba-ireland on 23/11/2024.