The site was identified as important in 1999 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1999) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1999. The most recent assessment (2021) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2021 | unfavourable | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Desert | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Desert | Absolute desert | 100 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Dida Galgalu desert (Kenya). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/dida-galgalu-desert-iba-kenya on 26/11/2024.