The site was identified as important in 2020 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Red-legged Cormorant Poikilocarbo gaimardi | NT | resident | 2016-2020 | 2-38 individuals | B1a |
Guanay Cormorant Leucocarbo bougainvilliorum | NT | resident | 2016-2020 | 28-3,000 individuals | B1a |
Black Skimmer Rynchops niger | LC | non-breeding | 2016-2020 | 1,800 individuals | A4 |
Franklin's Gull Larus pipixcan | LC | non-breeding | 2008 | 10,000-19,999 individuals | A4i |
Inca Tern Larosterna inca | NT | non-breeding | 2016-2020 | 4-28 individuals | B1a |
Elegant Tern Thalasseus elegans | NT | non-breeding | 2016-2020 | 10-100 individuals | A4, B1a |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2020) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2020. The most recent assessment (2017) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2017 | not assessed | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Peruvian Pelican Pelecanus thagus | 2,000 | 1,538 | individuals | 77 | near favourable |
Black Skimmer Rynchops niger | 4,500 | 4,500 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Franklin's Gull Larus pipixcan | 40,000 | 40,000 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Elegant Tern Thalasseus elegans | 4,030 | 1,800 | individuals | 45 | unfavourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | very poor (< 40%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Neritic | major (>10) | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Desembocadura del Río Bío-Bío (Chile). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/desembocadura-del-río-bío-bío-iba-chile on 23/11/2024.