TJ011
Dashtidjum


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('key species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Himalayan Snowcock Tetraogallus himalayensis LC resident (2000–2006) 8–10 breeding pairs A3
Goosander Mergus merganser LC resident (2000–2006) 200–250 individuals A4i
Yellow-eyed Pigeon Columba eversmanni VU breeding (2000–2006) 10–15 breeding pairs A1
Ibisbill Ibidorhyncha struthersii LC resident (2000–2006) 2–3 breeding pairs A3
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus NT winter (2000–2006) 4–6 individuals A1
Pallas's Fish-eagle Haliaeetus leucoryphus EN passage (2000–2006) 6–8 individuals A1
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug EN breeding (2000–2006) 1–2 breeding pairs A1
Yellow-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus LC resident (2000–2006) 20–40 breeding pairs A3
Hume's Lark Calandrella acutirostris LC breeding (2000–2006) 10–12 breeding pairs A3
Sulphur-bellied Warbler Phylloscopus griseolus LC breeding (2000–2006) 3–5 breeding pairs A3
Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria LC resident (2000–2006) 5–8 breeding pairs A3
White-winged Redstart Phoenicurus erythrogastrus LC breeding (2000–2006) 15–20 breeding pairs A3
Altai Accentor Prunella himalayana LC breeding (2000–2006) 7–9 breeding pairs A3
Alpine Accentor Prunella collaris LC breeding (2000–2006) 10–15 breeding pairs A3
Brown Accentor Prunella fulvescens LC breeding (2000–2006) 5–8 breeding pairs A3
Water Pipit Anthus spinoletta LC breeding (2000–2006) 20–30 breeding pairs A3
Red-mantled Rosefinch Carpodacus rhodochlamys LC resident (2000–2006) 8–9 breeding pairs A3
Eurasian Crimson-winged Finch Rhodopechys sanguineus LC resident (2000–2006) 25–40 breeding pairs A3

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.

IBA conservation status
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2007 not assessed low low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes unset medium

Pressure (threats to the key species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Biological resource use happen­ing now few individ­uals/small area (<10%) slow deteri­oration (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) low
Climate change and severe weather happen­ing now few individ­uals/small area (<10%) slow deteri­oration (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) low
Agricultural expansion and intensification happen­ing now few individ­uals/small area (<10%) no deteri­oration (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the key species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Most of site (50–90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) No manage­ment planning has taken place Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity low

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
1983 Даштиджум Заповедник (Ia) 100

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Artificial/Terrestrial -
Desert -
Forest -
Grassland -
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) -
Shrubland -
Wetlands (inland) -

Land use

Land use % of IBA
nature conservation and research 60
agriculture 5
forestry -
tourism/recreation -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2025) Important Bird Area factsheet: Dashtidjum (Tajikistan). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/dashtidjum-iba-tajikistan on 20/01/2025.