The site was identified as important in 2001 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Little Egret Egretta garzetta | LC | non-breeding | 1995 | 400 individuals | A4i |
Crab-plover Dromas ardeola | LC | non-breeding | 1995 | 700 individuals | A4i |
Madagascar Pratincole Glareola ocularis | NT | non-breeding | 1982 | 2,000 individuals | A4i |
Sooty Gull Larus hemprichii | LC | non-breeding | 1995 | 400 individuals | A4i |
Saunders's Tern Sternula saundersi | LC | non-breeding | 1995 | 1,000 individuals | A4i |
Roseate Tern Sterna dougallii | LC | non-breeding | 1995 | 3,000 individuals | A4i |
Lesser Crested Tern Thalasseus bengalensis | LC | non-breeding | 1995 | 500 individuals | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | non-breeding | 1995 | min 20,000 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2001) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2001. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | not assessed | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | unknown |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Mangrove No.20 | Forest Reserve | <1 |
- | Magroove | Forest Reserve | <1 |
- | Mangroove | Forest Reserve | <1 |
1975 | Dar es Salaam | Marine Reserve | 6 |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
Gezaulole Cultural Tourism Group | 1998 |
Youth Vision of Kigamboni | 2005 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Neritic | major (>10) | |
Forest | Mangrove | minor (<10) |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
urban/industrial/transport | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Dar es Salaam coast (Tanzania). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/dar-es-salaam-coast-iba-tanzania on 23/11/2024.