The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nilgiri Woodpigeon Columba elphinstonii | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2, A3 |
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus | NT | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1, A3 |
Malabar Grey Hornbill Ocyceros griseus | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A2, A3 |
Malabar Parakeet Nicopsitta columboides | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2, A3 |
Rufous Babbler Argya subrufa | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2, A3 |
Crimson-backed Sunbird Leptocoma minima | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2, A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2003 | not assessed | low | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Energy production and mining | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Natural system modifications | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1987 | Dandeli | Sanctuary | 56 |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
North Karnataka Birders Network | 0 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
energy production and mining | - |
forestry | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Dandeli Wildlife Sanctuary (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/dandeli-wildlife-sanctuary-iba-india on 26/11/2024.