• Summary
• Text account
• Data table and detailed info
• Map
• Reference and further resources

The site was identified as important in 2006 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:

Species	Red List1	Season	Year(s)	Size	IBA criteria
Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus	VU	winter	1996-2006	5-15 adults	A1
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca	NT	winter	1996-2006	12-60 adults	A1
Mallard Anas platyrhynchos	LC	winter	2006	2,500-10,408 adults	A4i
White Stork Ciconia ciconia	LC	winter	2006	40-150 adults	A4i
Great White Egret Ardea alba	LC	winter	2006	50-250 adults	A4i
Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo	LC	winter	2006	486-1,200 adults	A4i
Pallid Scops-owl Otus brucei	LC	breeding	2006	6-12 adults	A3
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga	VU	winter	2006	3-9 adults	A1
White-winged Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucopterus	LC	breeding	2006	8-20 adults	A3
Great Tit Parus major	LC	breeding	2006	200-400 adults	A3

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2006) may differ.

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2006. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat	Timing	Scope	Severity	Result
Biological resource use	happening now	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	slow but significant deterioration	high
Invasive and other problematic species and genes	happening now	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium
Human intrusions and disturbance	happening now	small area/few individuals (<10%)	slow but significant deterioration	low
Agricultural expansion and intensification	happening now	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	no or imperceptible deterioration	low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas	Management plan	Other action	Result
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation	A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive	Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity	medium

Habitat1	Habitat detail	% of IBA
Artificial/Terrestrial		30
Forest		30
Shrubland		30
Wetlands (inland)		10

1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use	% of IBA
forestry	100
hunting	100
nature conservation and research	100
agriculture	30
tourism/recreation	30
fisheries/aquaculture	10

---

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Dalverzin State Forestry and Hunting Management Area (Uzbekistan). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/dalverzin-state-forestry-and-hunting-management-area-iba-uzbekistan on 23/11/2024.