Data Zone
The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2006 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:| Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus | VU | winter (1996–2006) | 5–15 adults | A1 |
| Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | NT | winter (1996–2006) | 12–60 adults | A1 |
| Mallard Anas platyrhynchos | LC | winter (2006) | 2,500–10,408 adults | A4i |
| White Stork Ciconia ciconia | LC | winter (2006) | 40–150 adults | A4i |
| Great White Egret Ardea alba | LC | winter (2006) | 50–250 adults | A4i |
| Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo | LC | winter (2006) | 486–1,200 adults | A4i |
| Pallid Scops-owl Otus brucei | LC | breeding (2006) | 6–12 adults | A3 |
| Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | winter (2006) | 3–9 adults | A1 |
| White-winged Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucopterus | LC | breeding (2006) | 8–20 adults | A3 |
| Great Tit Parus major | LC | breeding (2006) | 200–400 adults | A3 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2006. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
| IBA conservation assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
| 2016 | not assessed | high | medium |
| Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
| yes | unset | good | |
| Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Biological resource use | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
| Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
| Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
| Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
| Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
| Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists, but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
| Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial/Terrestrial | 30 | |
| Forest | 30 | |
| Shrubland | 30 | |
| Wetlands (inland) | 10 |
| Land use | % of IBA |
|---|---|
| forestry | 100 |
| hunting | 100 |
| nature conservation and research | 100 |
| agriculture | 30 |
| tourism/recreation | 30 |
| fisheries/aquaculture | 10 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Dalverzin State Forestry and Hunting Management Area (Uzbekistan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/dalverzin-state-forestry-and-hunting-management-area-iba-uzbekistan on 23/12/2024.