The site was identified as important in 2002 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Green Peafowl Pavo muticus | EN | resident | 1998 | 14 males | A1 |
Siamese Fireback Lophura diardi | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A1 |
White-winged Duck Asarcornis scutulata | CR | resident | 1998 | 1 breeding pairs | A1 |
Pale-capped Pigeon Columba punicea | VU | resident | 1998 | 1 breeding pairs | A1 |
Grey-faced Tit-babbler Mixornis kelleyi | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2002) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2002. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2008 | unfavourable | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Shrubland | - | - | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Semi-evergreen rain forest (tropical), Moist deciduous forest (tropical), Dry deciduous forest (tropical) | 60 |
Shrubland | Secondary scrub | 40 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Dak Dam (Vietnam). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/dak-dam-iba-vietnam on 22/11/2024.