• Summary
• Text account
• Data table and detailed info
• Map
• Reference and further resources

The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:

Species	Red List1	Season	Year(s)	Size	IBA criteria
Wattled Guan Aburria aburri	LC	resident	2003	present	A1
Ecuadorian Piedtail Phlogophilus hemileucurus	LC	resident	2003	present	A1, A2
Napo Sabrewing Campylopterus villaviscensio	LC	resident	2003	present	A1, A2
Cinnamon Screech-owl Megascops petersoni	LC	resident	2003	present	A2, A3
Coppery-chested Jacamar Galbula pastazae	LC	resident	2003	present	A1, A2, A3
Cerise-crowned Jacamar Galbula chalcocephala	LC	resident	2003	present	A3
Brown Nunlet Nonnula brunnea	LC	resident	2003	present	A3
Lafresnaye's Piculet Picumnus lafresnayi	LC	resident	2003	present	A3
Spot-winged Parrotlet Touit stictopterus	NT	resident	2003	present	A1
White-bellied Antpitta Grallaria hypoleuca	LC	resident	2003	present	A3
Greater Scythebill Drymotoxeres pucheranii	LC	resident	2003	present	A1
Equatorial Greytail Xenerpestes singularis	LC	resident	2003	present	A1, A2
Bar-winged Wood-wren Henicorhina leucoptera	LC	resident	2003	present	A1, A2
Chestnut-bellied Thrush Turdus fulviventris	LC	resident	2003	present	A3
Orange-throated Tanager Wetmorethraupis sterrhopteron	VU	resident	2008	present	A1, A2, A3

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat	Timing	Scope	Severity	Result
Agricultural expansion and intensification	happening now	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium
Energy production and mining	likely in long term (beyond 4 years)	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium
Biological resource use	happening now	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium
Natural system modifications	happening now	small area/few individuals (<10%)	slow but significant deterioration	low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas	Management plan	Other action	Result
Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	not assessed

Year	Protected Area	Designation	% overlap with IBA
1999	Santiago - Comaina	Zona Reservada	100
2007	Tuntanain	Reserva Comunal	6
2007	Ichigkat Muja - Cordillera del Cóndor	Parque Nacional	5

Habitat1	Habitat detail	% of IBA
Forest	River-edge (river island) forest, Tropical lowland evergreen forest, Palm forest, Gallery (or Riparian) forest	major (>10)
Wetlands (inland)	Freshwater lakes and pools, Rivers, Riverine sand beaches	minor (<10)

1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use	% of IBA
nature conservation and research	major (>10)
agriculture	minor (<10)
fisheries/aquaculture	minor (<10)
hunting	minor (<10)
rangeland/pastureland	minor (<10)
forestry	minor (<10)
urban/industrial/transport	minor (<10)

---

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Cordillera del Cóndor (Peru). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/cordillera-del-cóndor-iba-peru on 22/11/2024.