The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Greylag Goose Anser anser | LC | winter | 2007 | 323-12,868 individuals | A4i |
Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus | VU | winter | 2007 | 7-18 individuals | A1 |
Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea | LC | winter | 2007 | 528-2,986 individuals | A4i |
Demoiselle Crane Anthropoides virgo | LC | passage | 2007 | 28-1,004 individuals | A4i |
Common Crane Grus grus | LC | passage | 2007 | 18-1,103 individuals | A4i |
Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo | LC | winter | 2007 | 108-4,640 individuals | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | winter | 2007 | 3,091-20,825 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | not assessed | very high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | medium |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Pollution | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers & streams, Standing fresh water, Water-fringe vegetation | 35 |
Shrubland | Low bushes | 5 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Perennial crops, orchards & groves | - |
Desert | - | |
Grassland | Steppes & dry calcareous | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
water management | 25 |
agriculture | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Chimkurgan Reservoir (Uzbekistan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/chimkurgan-reservoir-iba-uzbekistan on 22/11/2024.