The site was identified as important in 2003 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2003) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2003. The most recent assessment (2009) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2009 | very unfavourable | high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Sarus Crane Grus antigone | 87 | 87 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus | 338 | 338 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Giant Ibis Thaumatibis gigantea | 69 | 14 | individuals | 21 | very unfavourable |
Red-headed Vulture Sarcogyps calvus | 19 | 19 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | 62 | 43 | individuals | 70 | near favourable |
Slender-billed Vulture Gyps tenuirostris | 11 | 11 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1993 | Preah Vihear Temple | Protected Landscape | 2 |
1999 | Preah Vihear | Protected Forest | 64 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Lowland evergreen rain forest (tropical), Semi-evergreen rain forest (tropical), Dry deciduous forest (tropical) | major (>10) |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Rice paddies, Perennial crops, orchards and groves, Small settlements, rural gardens | minor (<10) |
Grassland | Edaphic grassland | minor (<10) |
Shrubland | Secondary scrub | minor (<10) |
Wetlands (inland) | Freshwater lakes and pools, Riverine floodplains, Rivers and streams, Ephemeral wetlands | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
military | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Chhep (Cambodia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/chhep-iba-cambodia on 22/11/2024.