The site was identified as important in 1999 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1999) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1999. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2023 | unfavourable | high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Grassland | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Savanna | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1941 | Kipkunurr | Forest Reserve | 16 |
1941 | Chemurokoi | Forest Reserve | 2 |
1941 | Kapchemutwa | Forest Reserve | 2 |
1941 | Sogotio | Forest Reserve | 4 |
1941 | Kapolet | Forest Reserve | 2 |
1941 | Kaisungor | Forest Reserve | 1 |
1954 | Embobut | Forest Reserve | 22 |
1954 | Kerrer | Forest Reserve | 2 |
1958 | Lelan | Forest Reserve | 15 |
1967 | Kiptaberr | Forest Reserve | 13 |
1967 | Kapkanyar | Forest Reserve | 6 |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
Chebororwa Sekemiat Self Help Group | 2005 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Montane forest - mixed | 65 |
Grassland | Grassland - montane | - |
Savanna | Bamboo - Montane | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Cherangani Hills (Kenya). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/cherangani-hills-iba-kenya on 22/11/2024.