• Summary
• Text account
• Data table and detailed info
• Map
• Reference and further resources

The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:

Species	Red List1	Season	Year(s)	Size	IBA criteria
Rufous-faced Crake Laterallus xenopterus	VU	resident	1998-2007	rare	A1
Crowned Solitary Eagle Buteogallus coronatus	EN	resident	1998-2007	rare	A1
Hyacinth Macaw Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus	VU	resident	1998-2006	rare	A1
Russet-mantled Foliage-gleaner Syndactyla dimidiata	LC	resident	-	present	A3
Chestnut-capped Foliage-gleaner Clibanornis rectirostris	LC	resident	-	present	A3
Bare-throated Bellbird Procnias nudicollis	NT	resident	1998-2007	rare	A1
Reiser's Tyrannulet Phyllomyias reiseri	LC	resident	-	present	A3
Sharp-tailed Tyrant Culicivora caudacuta	LC	resident	1998-2007	rare	A1
Cock-tailed Tyrant Alectrurus tricolor	VU	resident	1998-2007	rare	A1, A3
Curl-crested Jay Cyanocorax cristatellus	LC	resident	-	present	A3
Black-throated Saltator Saltator atricollis	LC	resident	-	present	A3
Marsh Seedeater Sporophila palustris	EN	passage	1998-2007	rare	A1
Marsh Seedeater Sporophila palustris	EN	passage	1998-1999	rare	A1

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2011) is shown below.

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat	Quantity (% remaining)	Quality (% carrying capacity)	Result
Forest	good (> 90%)	poor (40-69%)	unfavourable

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat	Timing	Scope	Severity	Result
Biological resource use	happening now	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	very rapid to severe deterioration	very high
Invasive and other problematic species and genes	happening now	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	very rapid to severe deterioration	very high
Natural system modifications	happening now	whole area/population (>90%)	very rapid to severe deterioration	very high
Agricultural expansion and intensification	happening now	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	moderate to rapid deterioration	high
Transportation and service corridors	likely in short term (within 4 years)	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas	Management plan	Other action	Result
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation	A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive	Very little or no conservation action taking place	low

Year	Protected Area	Designation	% overlap with IBA
-	Cerrados del Tagatija	Natural Private Reserve	-
1991	Serrania San Luis	Parque Nacional - Publico	8
1998	Paso Bravo	Parque Nacional - Publico	72
2001	Cerrado del Río Apa	Reservas de la Biosfera - Publico	73
2006	Cerrados del Tagatiya	Reserva Natural - Privado	4
2007	Tagatiya-mi	Reserva Natural - Privado	4
2013	Arrecife	Reserva Natural - Privado	<1

Habitat1	Habitat detail	% of IBA
Forest	Tropical semi-deciduous forest, Tropical semi-evergreen forest	58

1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use	% of IBA
agriculture	5
nature conservation and research	-

---

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Cerrados de Concepción (Paraguay). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/cerrados-de-concepción-iba-paraguay on 22/11/2024.